Read the text below quickly and see how many unusual
things you can discover about Robert Cook. Then compare your
answers. Now read the text again and check for all the extra unwanted or redundant grammar words.
Listen and check.

Practice until you can read the text without saying any of the unwanted words.
What do you think of this room?
Would you like to live in a house where everything was white?
|
- The 17th century Irish farmer Robert Cook was the most startling figure in the region.
- He never
did wore anything but
the
white linen.
Remove the auxilliary verb. After auxilliary verbs, the main verb takes the present tense.
We don't see auxilliary verbs after 'never' or most frequency adverbs.
The main verb here to wear is in the past form.
After an auxiliary verb the main verb takes the form of the bare infinitive.
Also notice that auxiliary verbs are not used after
Frequency Adverbs
such as never.
They are commonly used in question forms and some statement forms use them for emphasis.
- Not only were his nightclothes and shirts in purest white but
even so were
even
- his suits, coats and hats. He became so famous for his
even so
is used to add a clause that seems to contradict the previous sentence of clause. To include another item
on a list we use simply 'so'.
- clothes and his passion for white
although that he was
Although' must be removed from this sentence.
although
- known all over Ireland as 'Linen Cook'. He refused
him
- to have any black cattle in the fields of his farm and even
if
even if / even. What is the difference between even and even if?
if
- his horses had to be pure white. On one occasion a
- fox which had
been
attacked his poultry was caught.
'Had been' here seems to be a passive form. 'Had been attacking would
form the
present perfect
We know that in this sentence is can't be a passive form, because ... his poultry (Chickens, ducks or geese)
does not make sense. by his poultry gives us a completely opposite meaning. So, we must remove been
been
- However, he refused
him
to allow it to be killed.
He refused him. Is it ever possible to use both 'he' and 'him' in the same sentence to refer
to the same person? You can say 'He did that himself. but here the word 'him' must be removed.
-
Instead
of
he gave it a lecture on the evils of murder and then
- Do something else instead.
- instead of that, try this.
instead NOT (instead of)
- gave it
up
a sporting chance to escape. Cook was
to give up phrasal verb = To quit or stop doing something that you do regularly. Here we need give
Give (not give up )
- a passionate vegetarian and wouldn't
have eat the flesh
Without have. If we use have we need have eaten.
have eat = have eaten. (remove)
- of any animal or wear anything
which
produced by
- an animal. He had a long and healthy life and finally
- died in 1726 when he was over
than 80 years old.
- unsurprisingly, he was buried in a white shroud.
Plain text with incorrect words highlighted.
The 17th century Irish farmer Robert Cook was the most startling figure in the region.
He never did wore anything but the white linen.
Not only were his nightclothes and shirts in purest white but even so were
his suits, coats and hats.
He became so famous for his clothes and his passion for white although
that he was known all over Ireland as 'Linen Cook'.
He refused him
to have any black cattle in the fields of his farm and even
if his horses had to be pure white.
On one occasion a fox which had been
attacked his poultry was caught.
However, he refused to allow it to be killed.
Instead of
he gave it a lecture on the evils of murder and then gave it up
a sporting chance to escape.
Cook was a passionate vegetarian and wouldn't
have
eat the flesh
of any animal or wear anything which
produced by an animal.
He had a long and healthy life and finally died in 1726 when he was over
than 80 years old.
Unsurprisingly, he was buried in a white shroud.
|